EDR provides valuable endpoint visibility, but modern application attacks require application runtime context. Security teams often know which process behaved suspiciously—but not which library, function, or dependency actually caused it.
Engineering Friction
Security alerts without code-level evidence are difficult for developers to validate and remediate.
Process-Level Visibility
EDR identifies processes and endpoints but lacks application execution context.
Slow Root Cause
Finding the responsible library or function often requires manual investigation.
The Comparison
Raven ADR vs EDR
Category
Raven ADR
Traditional EDR
What It Detects
Detects suspicious runtime behavior
Detects suspicious endpoint behavior
Focus
Focuses on applications, libraries, and functions
Focuses on processes and hosts
Telemetry
Runtime call chains and dependency attribution
Process trees and network telemetry
Investigation
Automatic runtime attribution
Manual analyst investigation
Respose
Runtime prevention and remediation
Endpoint response actions
Key Question it Answers
Answers: "Which library and function?"
Answers: "Which process?"
Built for
Built for application runtime visibility
Built for infrastructure visibility
The Pipeline
How Raven Changes the Investigation
1
Detect
Observe suspicious runtime behavior.
2
Attribute
Identify the exact library and function responsible.
3
Correlate
Connect runtime evidence with vulnerabilities, exploit paths, and dependencies.
4
Prioritize
AI ranks real production risk using runtime evidence.
5
Prevent
Al pinpoints the vulnerable function inside each loaded library.
6
Guide Remediation
Provide developers with precise code-level evidence.
Use Cases
CVE Prioritization
Focus on vulnerabilities that are actually being exploited in production.
Zero-Day Response
Identify where newly disclosed vulnerabilities are loaded or executed.
Virtual Patching
Apply runtime protection while permanent fixes are being developed.
Exploit Prevention
Stop risky behavior using runtime context instead of signatures.