Security teams have too many findings across too many tools. ASPM helps centralize and prioritize them, but posture is only as strong as the signals behind it. Without runtime evidence, teams still struggle to prove which risks are active in production.
Too many signals
Too many findings across too many tools. ASPM helps centralize and prioritize them, but produces only as strong asthe signals beneath it.
Static-only inputs
Static analysis doesn't show what's active in production.
Low credibility with engineering
Both challenges result in difficultyvalidating risk.
The Pipeline
How Raven strengthens ASPM
Raven feeds programs with production-generated evidence that turns static findings into defensible priorities.
The Relationship
Raven is the runtime evidence layer. ASPM is the system of record.
Raven should strengthen ASPM - not compete with it.
RISK REDUCTION
Vulnerability Prioritization
Prove which findings matter in production.
Developer Proof
Give engineering concrete call-chain evidence.
ENGINEERING TRUST
Zero-Day Response
Find where newly disclosed risks are active.
DEVELOPER VELOCITY
Executive Reporting
Report real exposure, not just ticket volume.
LEADERSHIP CLARITY
Use Cases
Built for security teams who need to prove it.
Raven
Observes production, traces reachability, and generates evidence that proves which vulnerabilities are actually exploitable.
/Runtime prevention layer
+
ASPM
Centralizes and organizes findings from all your security tools - the authoritative source for your application risk posture.
/System of record
Together → Evidence-backed prioritization your engineering team actually trusts
.svg)
.svg)
.webp)
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
