Raven vs ASPM Badge

Prove what's real at runtime.

ASPM organizes your application risk. Raven proves which findings are actually reachable in production, giving your team evidence, not guesswork.
Explore Runtime Prevention
Comparison between a traditional application security tool and Synk, showing features and benefits of each side.
The Problem

Security teams have no shortage of noise.

Security teams have too many findings across too many tools. ASPM helps centralize and prioritize them, but posture is only as strong as the signals behind it. Without runtime evidence, teams still struggle to prove which risks are active in production.
Too many signals
Static-only inputs
Low credibility with engineering
The Pipeline

How Raven strengthens ASPM

Raven feeds programs with production-generated evidence that turns static findings into defensible priorities.
Flowchart with blocks labeled Raven Runtime Prevention, ASPM, SAST, SCA, Secrets, IaC, and Prioritized Remediation.
The Relationship

Raven is the runtime evidence layer.
ASPM is the system of record.

Raven should strengthen ASPM - not compete with it.
Vulnerability Prioritization
Developer Proof
Zero-Day Response
Executive Reporting
Use Cases

Built for security teams who need to prove it.

Raven
Observes production, traces reachability, and generates evidence that proves which vulnerabilities are actually exploitable.
/Runtime prevention layer
+
ASPM
Centralizes and organizes findings from all your security tools - the authoritative source for your application risk posture.
/System of record
Together → Evidence-backed prioritization your engineering team actually trusts