Runtime enforcement for regulated industries

Security controls must be enforced - not just documented. Documentation alone does not reduce runtime risk in regulated environments.
Book a demo

Most security tools only observe.

Controls are advisory, not enforced
Most tools generate alerts and reports, but allow risky code paths to execute in production - even in regulated environments.
Evidence is indirect and noisy
Audits rely on scan results, CVE counts, and policies that don’t reflect what actually ran in production.
Runtime risk changes faster than compliance cycles
CI/CD velocity, dependency churn, and AI-generated code invalidate static controls within days.

Enforced Runtime Controls
(Not Just Detection)

With Raven, compliance teams gain real enforcement, not best-effort monitoring. Raven doesn’t rely on alerts or dashboards alone, it actively prevents malicious execution paths in production - including known CVEs, CVE-Less and abused legitimate libraries.
Security dashboard showing CVE-2025-19475 with 9.2 severity, 75% EPSS, block policy on all clusters.
Code dependency graph showing native libs and OSS with a violating library next@16.0.6 in red highlight.

Audit-Ready Runtime Evidence

Raven records what actually executed in production like which libraries ran, which functions were invoked, and which execution paths were blocked or allowed.With Raven, Audits are based on runtime truth, not theoretical exposure.

Reduced Vulnerability Noise

While traditional SCA overwhelms regulated teams with thousands of findings, Raven demonstrates risk-based prioritization, aligned with compliance intent.
Raven Runtime SCA:
  • Focuses only on executed code paths
  • Deprioritizes vulnerabilities that never run
  • Aligns remediation with real production risk
Dashboard showing risk focus with 1674 total in disk, 972 in memory, 554 executed at CPU, 36 vulnerabilities executed.
Dark buttons on green background labeled Fed-Ramp Environments, FinTech, Healthcare, SOC2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS 4.

Where this is used

Common regulated environments
  • Fed-Ramp Environments
  • Financial services & FinTech
  • Healthcare & life sciences
  • Enterprise SaaS with SOC 2 / ISO 27001 obligations
  • Platforms with customer-facing SLAs
  • Organizations with strict change-control requirements
  • PCI DSS 4

Enforce Security at Runtime

Book a demo
You patched Log4J. AI is working on the next and here's why patching alone won't be enough.
Security
Step-by-step guide to patching Log4Shell (CVE-2021-44228), why initial fixes were incomplete, and how runtime prevention protects live patching windows.
Read more
What Is IAST, and Why Testing Runtime Is Not the Same as Protecting Runtime
Security
IAST uses runtime sensors to find vulnerabilities during testing. Learn how it works, how it compares to SAST and DAST, and its production limits.
Read more
ADR vs EDR: Why Endpoint Detection Misses Application-Layer Attacks
Security
Compare ADR vs EDR and learn why endpoint-first security misses application-layer attacks, vulnerable code paths, library behavior, and runtime exploit context.
Read more