ASSESSMENT · SECURE THE BOOKENDS

Can you detect and respond to threats inside your applications?

Evaluate whether your security program can protect applications across the full software lifecycle, from development through production.
11 questions · ~3 minutes · No sensitive information required
WHAT YOU’LL GET ● SAMPLE
READINESS LEVEL
Developing
Application Visibility
Runtime Exposure and Prioritization
Detection and Response
AppSec and SOC Alignment
Risk Reporting
/ 01 — WHY IT MATTERS

Finding known vulnerabilities  is only half the lifecycle.

THE GAP

Applications keep changing after deployment

Modern application security programs are effective at finding known vulnerabilities. But not every threat arrives with a CVE, signature, or available patch.
THE OTHER BOOKEND

Application Detection and Response

ADR helps security teams understand what applications are doing at runtime, determine which risks represent actual exposure, and respond to malicious behavior inside the application.
/ 02 — WHAT YOU’LL ASSESS

Five readiness categories.

Answer each question based on your organization’s current capabilities.
1 · No or not sure
2 · Limited
3 · Mostly
4 · Yes, consistently
CATEGORY 01

Application Visibility

3 QUESTIONS
CATEGORY 02

Runtime Exposure and Prioritization

2 QUESTIONS
CATEGORY 03

Detection and Response

3 QUESTIONS
CATEGORY 04

AppSec and SOC Alignment

2 QUESTIONS
CATEGORY 01

Risk Reporting

1 QUESTIONS
Question 4 of 11
~2 min left
CATEGORY 01 · APPLICATION VISIBILITY

Are you running an EDR on your servers today?

EDR protects the host and operating system. Consider whether it covers the servers that run your critical applications.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 01 · APPLICATION VISIBILITY

Do you maintain an accurate inventory of your critical custom and commercial applications?

Consider whether you know each application’s owner, business criticality, deployment location, and production status.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 01 · APPLICATION VISIBILITY

Can you see which components, functions, and code paths are executing in production?

This includes open-source dependencies, third-party libraries, frameworks, and application functions.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 02 · RUNTIME EXPOSURE AND PRIORITIZATION

Can you determine whether vulnerable functionality is reachable and executing in production?

Finding a vulnerable component does not always mean the affected code can be exploited in your environment.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 02 · RUNTIME EXPOSURE AND PRIORITIZATION

Do you prioritize application-security findings using runtime evidence and business context?

Relevant factors may include application criticality, runtime reachability, active execution, sensitive data access, observed attack activity, and available mitigations.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 03 · DETECTION AND RESPONSE

Can you detect suspicious application behavior without relying on a known signature or CVE?

Examples include unexpected code execution, unusual call chains, business-logic abuse, malicious dependencies, and legitimate functionality used with malicious intent.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 03 · DETECTION AND RESPONSE

Can investigators identify the code, dependency, function, and call chain responsible for suspicious behavior?

Application-level context can help teams move from a general alert to a specific technical cause.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 03 · DETECTION AND RESPONSE

Can you contain malicious application behavior when a patch is unavailable or cannot be deployed immediately?

Consider whether your team has response options beyond waiting for a patch, blocking network traffic, or isolating an entire host.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 04 · APPSEC AND SOC ALIGNMENT

Can the SOC connect WAF, EDR, SIEM, or identity alerts to the application behavior that caused them?

This helps analysts understand what happened inside the application, not only at the network, endpoint, or infrastructure layer.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 04 · APPSEC AND SOC ALIGNMENT

Do AppSec, the SOC, development teams, and application owners follow a shared response workflow?

The workflow should clearly define investigation, ownership, escalation, mitigation, and remediation.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
CATEGORY 05 · RISK REPORTING

Can security leaders identify which application risks pose the greatest threat to critical business services?

Effective reporting should communicate actual exposure and potential business impact, not only vulnerability counts and severity scores.
YOUR ANSWER
PRESS 1–4 TO ANSWER · ← BACK
PROCESSING

Analyzing your ADR readiness.

Evaluating application visibility, runtime risk prioritization, detection and response, team alignment, and risk reporting
Application Visibility QUEUED
Runtime Exposure and Prioritization QUEUED
Detection and Response QUEUED
AppSec and SOC Alignment QUEUED
Risk Reporting QUEUED
YOUR ADR READINESS LEVEL

You’re
Foundational.

Your application-security program is primarily focused on known vulnerabilities.
Your organization likely has tools for finding vulnerabilities during development, but limited visibility into application behavior after deployment.

This can make it difficult to determine which findings represent actual exposure, investigate application-layer attacks, or respond when no CVE or patch exists.
YOUR SCORE
8 / 33
Foundational
Developing
Runtime-Aware
Runtime-Resilient
STRONGEST AREA Risk Reporting
TOP OPPORTUNITY Application Visibility
/ 01 — YOUR BREAKDOWN

Your results across  five categories.

/ 02 — NEXT STEP

Secure both ends of the application lifecycle.

Raven protects applications from inside the runtime, with code-level visibility into which dependency, function, and call chain caused suspicious behavior. It helps protect custom, open-source, and commercial applications, including against attacks that do not yet have a CVE.
This assessment is an educational resource. It does not constitute a formal security evaluation, risk assessment, or guarantee of protection.
Retake assessment